
Wins on cost and output
Frigidaire Gallery EFIC255 vs GE Profile Opal 2.0
185 W published versus a 360 VA nameplate. 44 lbs a day versus 38. A real contest.
Updated October 2026 · Scooter M.
October 17, 2026
Nugget Report
Two machines, one decision. Every comparison here is built from the manufacturers' own published specs, with the fields neither of them publishes marked as such.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

A head-to-head is the last page you read before you buy, which makes it the page where an invented number does the most damage. It is also, in this category, the page most likely to contain one.
The pattern is easy to spot once you know it. A comparison table with two full columns of specifications, no citations, and one machine from a manufacturer that publishes a specification table alongside one from a manufacturer that does not. The second column was written by a seller, and the page does not say so.
| Manufacturer | Specification table | What it includes |
|---|---|---|
| GE (Opal line) | Yes, the fullest here | Current, daily and hourly ice rate, bin capacity, clearance, weight, and an operating range on the original |
| Frigidaire | Yes | Voltage, power consumption in watts, daily output, refrigerant, dimensions |
| NewAir | Yes | Voltage, current or rated power, refrigerant, bin capacity, weight, dimensions |
| Euhomy | No | Manuals exist; no specification section |
| ecozy | No | None retrievable |
| KBice | No | User and service manuals, neither with specifications |
This is why some comparisons on this site are short. A page pitting a documented machine against an undocumented one cannot honestly run to a long table, and padding it out would mean inventing the second half.
What we never compare on: noise, because nobody publishes a decibel rating; build quality, because we have not handled these machines; and reliability, because nobody can honestly claim it without years of units in the field.
Not two brands. Two appliance classes. If what you want is ice that is simply always there, the honest answer is often that no countertop machine does that, and the page you want is countertop versus undercounter.
After that, the most useful matchup in this category is Frigidaire against the GE Opal 2.0, because both manufacturers publish enough for a genuine side-by-side and they disagree in an interesting way: Frigidaire wins on published output and running cost, GE wins on documentation.

Wins on cost and output
185 W published versus a 360 VA nameplate. 44 lbs a day versus 38. A real contest.
Updated October 2026 · Scooter M.

The Opal you can buy today
2.5 A versus 3.0 A, 24 lbs versus 38, 44 lbs versus 37.6. And the support page mix-up.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

The GE you can buy today
GE publishes six specs, ecozy publishes none. What an honest comparison looks like.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

Best countertop value
Plug in versus install. Which class of ice maker actually solves your problem.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

The one still in stock
A bigger bin, a lighter body and less current, against GE's deeper documentation.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

The documented choice
One publishes 185 W and 44 lbs a day. The other publishes nothing.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

Best nugget machine
Chewable versus slow-melting. How each is made and which belongs in your glass.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

Only for the bundle
Identical on current, weight and bin. The Ultra wants 4 inches of clearance and publishes no ice rate.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

The one still in stock
A dispenser with no published specs against the best-documented machine in the category.
Updated October 2026 · Scooter M.

Most ice per watt
185 W against 170 W, both published. The only comparison here built on real consumption figures.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

Best for bullet ice
Fast hollow cylinders against slow dense cubes, on published specs from both manuals.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

Best for most kitchens
2.0 A against 3.0 A, 2.6 lbs of bin against 3.0, and one published footprint between them.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

Best documented buy
Frigidaire publishes the rate and the watts. GE publishes the clearance and the temperature range. Neither publishes both.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

More ice, less counter
170 W against 185 W, a published temperature range against a published ice rate.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.

The one you can check
One publishes a full technical table, the other publishes nothing. Same ice, different evidence.
Updated September 2026 · Scooter M.
#ad We earn a commission on purchases made through this link. How this is funded. Prices last checked October 19, 2026.
The full field with every machine ranked is on the nugget roundup and the countertop roundup. Individual machines have their own pages under reviews, each built from the same manufacturer documents these comparisons use.
Four matchups added most recently: Opal 2.0 against the Opal 2.0 Ultra, which is a smaller gap than the naming suggests; the Frigidaire EFIC255 against the NewAir NIM030SS00, two of the three nugget machines here whose manuals publish a wattage; the Gevi V2.0 against that same Frigidaire, which is the other comparison here where both cost figures are real; Kismile against Gevi, two budget brands where only one publishes anything; KBice against the GE Opal, a dispenser against a documented machine; and bullet ice against clear ice, the third side of the ice-type triangle.
And the newest matchup, now that GE sells Opals at both ends of a range: the Opal Mini against the Opal 2.0 Ultra. And across brands at the same price, the Opal Mini against the Frigidaire Gallery EFIC255, where each manufacturer publishes precisely what the other one leaves out.